首页> 外文OA文献 >Comparison of Different Pairing Fluctuation Approaches to BCS-BEC Crossover
【2h】

Comparison of Different Pairing Fluctuation Approaches to BCS-BEC Crossover

机译:不同配对波动方法与BCs-BEC的比较   交叉

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

The subject of BCS - Bose Einstein condensation (BEC) crossover isparticularly exciting because of its realization in ultracold Fermi gases andits possible relevance to high temperature superconductors. In the paper wereview that body of theoretical work on this subject which represents a naturalextension of the seminal papers by Leggett and by Nozieres and Schmitt-Rink(NSR). The former addressed only the ground state, now known as the"BCS-Leggett" wave-function and the key contributions of the latter pertain tocalculations of the superfluid transition temperature $T_c$. These two papershave given rise to two main and, importantly, distinct, theoretical schools inthe BCS-BEC crossover literature. The first of these extends the BCS-Leggettground state to finite temperature and the second extends the NSR scheme awayfrom $T_c$ both in the superfluid and normal phases. It is now rather widelyaccepted that these extensions of NSR produce a different ground state thanthat first introduced by Leggett. Our analysis shows how the NSR-based approachviews the bosonic contributions more completely but it treats the fermions as"quasi-free". By contrast, the BCS-Leggett based approach treats the fermioniccontributions more completely but it treats the bosons as "quasi-free". The NSRbased schemes approach the crossover between BCS and BEC by starting from theBEC limit and the BCS-Leggett based scheme approaches this crossover bystarting from the BCS limit. Ultimately, one would like to combine these twoschemes. In this paper we review the strengths and weaknesses of bothapproaches. To reach a full understanding, it is important in the future toinvest effort in investigating in more detail the T=0 aspects of NSR-basedtheory and the $T \neq 0$ aspects of BCS-Leggett theory.
机译:BCS-玻色爱因斯坦凝聚(BEC)交叉的主题特别令人兴奋,因为它是在超冷费米气体中实现的,并且可能与高温超导体有关。本文认为该主题的理论工作是Leggett和Nozieres和Schmitt-Rink(NSR)对开创性论文的自然延伸。前者仅处理基态,现称为“ BCS-Leggett”波函数,后者的关键作用在于计算超流体转变温度$ T_c $。在BCS-BEC跨界文献中,这两篇论文引起了两个主要的,而且重要的是截然不同的理论流派。其中第一个将BCS-Leggettground状态扩展到有限温度,第二个将NSR方案从$ T_c $扩展到超流体阶段和正常阶段。如今,NSR的这些扩展产生的基态与Leggett最初引入的基态不同,这已被广泛接受。我们的分析表明,基于NSR的方法如何更完整地观察到玻色子的贡献,但将费米子视为“准无”。相比之下,基于BCS-Leggett的方法更彻底地处理了铁离子贡献,但将玻色子视为“准无”。基于NSR的方案通过从BEC限制开始,来解决BCS和BEC之间的交叉,而基于BCS-Leggett的方案通过从BCS限制开始来解决这一交叉。最终,人们希望将这两种方案结合起来。在本文中,我们回顾了这两种方法的优缺点。为了获得全面的了解,将来有必要投入更多精力来详细研究基于NSR的理论的T = 0方面和BCS-Leggett理论的$ T \ neq 0 $方面。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号